So I choose to write my oped on the importance of learning
about a culture before you try and serve them. I chose this first because I
wanted something that would let me talk about charity work and service in
foreign countries because I think it is one of the only things I actually get
passionate about. I also thought of this idea because I am taking an
international development class that has really made me rethink development and
charity work. Like my teacher was saying the audience for this piece is
supposed to be BYU students and so I thought that since we’re all religious
here that service would be an easily accepted topic. But then I was doing the
reading in WR chapter 2 and it said that you want to introduce an argument that
won’t automatically be agreed with. So I am thinking of introducing my argument
as the importance of individualistic services versus serving millions. By this
I mean that I think it is much more effective to give meaningful service that
you KNOW will help someone (because you took the time to get to know them
beforehand) versus just pumping money into a “less developed” country. I thought to support my argument I could talk
about my experience in northern India about a year ago. I went to a town called
Chamba, India and taught young children English for a week. Some things that I
realized is that although our service was meaningful to the kids the English
lessons we prepared for them could have been better prepared personally on my
part. I should have studied out the materials before hand in order to make the
learning the most profitable for the kids. I still think they learned, but if I
would have been better prepared then I would have been able to adjust better to
what their personal needs were instead of just what I was “supposed to do”. One
thing that I really did like about my group though was the personal time we got
to spend getting to know the children. We spent all week getting to know the
school kids we were serving and at the end we had the chance to implement a
special service project based on their needs. For example in my school we
taught on the roof because the basement (the actual school) was unfinished. The
roof was flat and plesant but it also had a large drop off the side and if any
kid would have fallen off of it they could have been seriously hurt. So for our
personalized project we hired local workers to build a barrier around the roof so the kids would be safe. I am so glad
we did serviced this way instead of deciding what the children needed before we
even met them, because I think whatever we would have chosen beforehand would
have been unsatisfactory. When you take the time to learn about a culture and
individual’s needs before you start serving it makes the service so much more
meaningful. It’s like any paper, if you don’t take time to do the research
needed or think about what you want to say beforehand the paper won’t be nearly
as persuasive or meaningful as it could have been if you were prepared. I hope
when I’m writing this paper that I can find some good statistics to help prove
my point as well as provide my personal experience from India. I don’t know if
everyone will be interested in the topic but I hope if I present it well enough
people will be. I hope that I can write
in such a way that not only inspires people to serve in other nations but also
to go about that service in the right way. In my development class my professor
talked about how the common idea of what a developed nation should be is a
capitalist society that has a democracy, but he brought up the point that that
may not be what every culture wants or needs. So in order to best help those in
developing countries you have to first go there and get a feel for their
culture and actually talk to CITIZENS not the government who may not always
have the poor in their best interest. When you talk to the people you plan on
implementing a certain development plan on you can change it and mold it to
match their needs. The downside to this approach of service is that it can not
be as wide-scaled or “mass production” like us, as americans, would like it to
be and so it could be frustrating to people. They would rather help a lot of
people a tiny bit rather than a small
village or group a lot. I think it is a fine line to walk because you want to
help as many people as possible, but I also know that if you try to implement
the same pan for everyone it definely won’t work. Because every culture, every
town, and every person is different so when you try to make a blanket solution
it may help a few, but the rest will be left off no better than before. I’m scared to write this paper because I
think it is going to be hard to get my argument to come across the right way. I
also really want it to be persuasive and meaningful to b=people because it is
so meaningful to me. I also think I need more examples to demonstrate my point
because one personal experience just isn’t enough. Maybe if I talk to my
international development teacher he could point me to some good research…
No comments:
Post a Comment